All articles
Buying Guides|5 min read||By Arne Niitsoo

AI Note Takers for In-Person Meetings: What to Check

For an in-person meeting, start with the recording. A phone, laptop or dedicated recorder needs to pick up everyone clearly enough for the software to transcribe the conversation and separate the speakers.

The difficult part is often the shared microphone. Several people may be audible, but their words can still be assigned to the wrong speaker. Check that before relying on the resulting notes.

Teneks is our product. The vendor table below records the documentation review from September 2026; it is separate from our own recording tests.

Choose a recording setup

A phone or laptop app is convenient when the device is already in the room. A dedicated recorder or external microphone may suit a larger space, but check the audio it produces before assuming it will improve the result.

Written notes remain an option when a recording is unsuitable. Decide which details the team needs to keep and who will record the decisions.

OptionWhat to check
Phone or laptop microphoneWhether quieter speakers are audible and typing or table noise interferes
Dedicated recorder or external microphonePlacement, file compatibility and the extra device setup
Written notesWho captures decisions and how participants check them

Listen to a short test recording

Use the room and seating arrangement you expect for the meeting. Ask people at different positions to speak and listen back.

Move the device if someone sounds distant. Avoid typing on a laptop whose microphone is recording the room. Check for background noise and echo before the conversation starts.

Overlapping speech can be difficult to transcribe and attribute. Include some natural back-and-forth in the test instead of having everyone speak one at a time throughout.

Check speaker labels against the audio

A transcript may merge two people into one speaker or split one person across several labels. Review moments when speakers change, particularly around decisions and commitments.

Ask how labels are assigned and whether you can correct them. If the product offers voice enrolment, check how it works in later meetings rather than assuming the first result carries over.

Our three-tool meeting test found attribution errors when two people shared a laptop. The shared portion contained very little speech from one of them, so further recordings would be needed to assess that case properly.

Consent when there is no join notice

On a video call, the tool announces itself. The bot appears in the participant list, or a banner says the meeting is being recorded. In a room there is no banner. Nobody sees the phone start recording, and if you rely on the tool to do the notifying, nobody has been notified.

So you say it. Out loud, before you press record, and then you press record early enough that the sentence is in the recording. The wording from our call recording consent checker works in a room once "call" becomes "conversation": "Before we start, I want to let you know this conversation is being recorded. Are you okay with continuing on that basis?"

It is a question, so the answer is on the recording too. And it belongs at the very start, which means recording before the greeting, not after the small talk. We wrote about why in why the opening minutes decide your recording compliance.

The rule you are following depends on where the meeting is and, for a visitor from abroad, where they are from. Estonia and Finland both follow the GDPR pattern: a lawful basis plus telling the participants. If the person across the table is visiting from a jurisdiction that requires every participant's consent, the safer course is the stricter rule. The checker gives the verdict for any pair, and the country pages, for example Estonia and Finland, have the primary sources.

Vendor documentation reviewed in September 2026

This table records the descriptions checked for the original comparison. It is not a scored test of every product. “Not checked” identifies gaps in that review; confirm current availability and plan details before choosing.

ToolRecords in a roomHowSpeaker labels in a room (vendor's own description)Estonian, Finnish, Polish, Latvian, Lithuanian
TeneksYesDesktop app microphone on macOS and Windows, iOS microphone recording or file uploadBy voice, with voice enrolment so the same person is named next timeTranscription and analysis in all five
OtterYesMobile app or browser, device microphoneNot stated on the in-person help page we checkedTranscription in 6 languages only (English, Spanish, French, German, Japanese, Chinese). None of the five.
FirefliesYesMobile app record button, or web recorderNot stated on the in-person help page we checkedListed for all five (100+ languages)
MeetGeekYesMobile app, desktop app microphone, or uploadNot stated on the in-person help page we checkedMobile app lists 30+ languages. Not checked for the five.
GranolaYesLaptop microphone on Mac and Windows, phone on iOSBy voice. Vendor says accuracy varies with participants and voice similarityNot checked
GongYesMobile app recordingFor uploaded room recordings, Caller 1, Caller 2, with voice identification depending on quality (community forum, Gong staff). Mobile app recordings not described.Not checked
FathomNot todayHelp centre: in-person capture "coming soon" on iOSVendor states it cannot distinguish speakers in the same roomNot checked

Review the meeting output

After an appropriately arranged test recording, check whether everyone appears in the transcript. Look at names, figures and any point where people talk over one another.

Then read the summary. Does it preserve the decisions and distinguish them from suggestions? Are actions assigned to the right person? Keep the recording available while checking important details.

Try the workflow in Teneks

Teneks supports meeting recording through its desktop app and the iOS microphone, as well as uploaded recordings. The iOS app records meetings through the microphone; it does not record phone calls.

Upload a recording to inspect the meeting output. The Meetings page explains how transcripts, summaries and next steps fit together.

Try it on a call of your own

Everything above is easy to claim and easy to check. Drop in a real recording (your language, your speakers, your background noise) and read the transcript and summary of the first 30 seconds. Free, no account.

Test your recording

Written by Arne Niitsoo

Arne is the founder of Teneks, a call intelligence platform built in Tallinn, Estonia. His work lives inside real conversations: how speech becomes text, how voices get told apart, and why the languages of the Nordics and Baltics break most tools. He writes from what he hears in real calls, not from theory.